NRS 433 wk3 template – Quantitative Research Critique

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Your Name

Grand Canyon University

Date:

You will pick two of your approved quantitative studies for this assignment. Please make sure you read my feedback because if I told you that the article was not approved, then you will get a zero for this assignment if you use it.

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

This is your introduction. Please tell the reader about your topic of interest. Explain why you are interested in researching this topic. Be careful not to write exactly what you wrote in week 2 paper or you will self-plagiarizeJ. Please include your PICO in either the introduction or the background.

Title and Author(s) of Article 1

Background Article 1

Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Did the authors cite a hypothesis? Be sure to support your response with textbook information regarding the hypothesis that drove the study. NRS 433 wk3 template – Quantitative Research Critique

Title and Author(s) of Article 2

Background Article 2

Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Did the authors cite a hypothesis? Be sure to support your response with textbook information regarding the hypothesis that drove the study.

Relationship to Nursing Practice

        Explain how each of your two articles will be used to answer your PICO question and how interventions and comparison groups in the articles relate to those in your PICO question NRS 433 wk3 template – Quantitative Research Critique

Method of Study- Article 1

Was the study descriptive, correlational, experimental, quasi-experimental? Did the researcher tell you what type of study this is, or did you deduct it from textbook definition and the way the researcher collected data- such as how the sample was collected, variables, etc.? Use your book to support your response. Describe the sample population. What does your book say about population sample size? What data collection tools were used? How did the researchers sort the data? How were results analyzed? How was bias controlled?

There is always a review of the literature section. Find the section and see what types of literature the authors read to get foundation for this study. What does your textbook author say about articles older than 5 years and importance of scholarly articles in the literature review? In the review of the literature did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? Are the references current? Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? Were articles strong evidence to support the study?

Method of Study- Article 2

Was the study descriptive, correlational, experimental, quasi-experimental? Did the researcher tell you what type of study this is, or did you deduct it from textbook definition and the way the researcher collected data- such as how the sample was collected, variables, etc.? Use your book to support your response. Describe the sample population. What does your book say about population sample size? What data collection tools were used? How did the researchers sort the data? How were results analyzed? How was bias controlled?

There is always a review of the literature section. Find the section and see what types of literature the authors read to get foundation for this study. What does your textbook author say about articles older than 5 years and importance of scholarly articles in the literature review? In the review of the literature did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? Are the references current? Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? Were articles strong evidence to support the study? NRS 433 wk3 template – Quantitative Research Critique

Combined Results of the Studies

Summarize key findings of each study in two comprehensive paragraphs. Please make sure you include implications of the two studies to nursing practice.

Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes Comparison

What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question? How do the outcomes of your chosen articles compare to your anticipated outcomes?

Conclusion

Make sure to emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement, provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. Also, incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned

References

YOUR ARTICLES (PLUS YOUR BOOK)

McNiff, P. & Petrick, M. (n.d.). Quantitative research: Ethics, theory, and research in Helbig, J. (n.d.) History and process of nursing research, evidence-based nursing practice and quantitative and qualitative research. From: https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1/#/chapter/3 NRS 433 wk3 template – Quantitative Research Critique

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation Guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: